CLICK HERE TO READ ABOUT ST. JOHNS GOP'S LANDMARK VICTORY OVER THE ANTI-TRUMP FACTIONS CONTROLLING THE
REPUBLICAN PARTY'S REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE!
CLICK HERE TO READ ST. JOHNS GOP'S ALL AMERICAN REPUBLICAN CONSTITUTION!
Manuel P. Asensio Co-Chair of the St. Johns Republican Presidential Executive Committee
Americans must always remember the great Judge Brandeis’s words, “there is no federal general common law.”
Message to Our Fellow Republican Party of Florida Leaders
Americans are repulsed by secret associations, secret proceedings, and secret agreements in any form at any level in our government so why are we Republicans allowing the fourteen federal judges who control the US Judicial Conference to make private deals with private parties, our congressional representatives, and the leaders of the Department of Justice to coerce Americans into believing that fascist and communist policies are constitutional and legally enforceable, and even morally justifiable?
And why are we Republicans allowing
candidate Kamala Harris to score political points by blaming President Donald J. Trump for overturning of Roe vs. Wade. Why are we allowing Harris to claim Trump committed national security, banking, election, and sexual crimes and that Trump is scheduled to be sentenced to prison in New York without a fight?
Nothing that Kamala Harris said has anything to do with Trump’s conduct. Rather, the original Roe v. Wade and the weaponization of the judicial system against Trump has everything to do with organized federal judicial corruption at the U.S. Judicial Conference."
Manuel P. Asensio
Post -2024 GOP Primary Election Address to the
Members of the Republican Executive Committees and
State Committee of the Republican Party of Florida
September 17, 2024
Welcome to the official site of the St. Johns Presidential Executive Committee is an organization of St. Johns County Republicans EXECUTIVE LEADERS who are dealing with the Republican Party's failure to regulate federal judges' fraudulent and illegal actions against the Constitution. We have a pending charter application with the Republican Party of Florida. Please read the Constitution of the St. Johns Presidential Executive Committee.
We are exposing and fighting the insanity of the Republican Party's idea that you can fix organized federal judicial corruption by adding more conservative judges to the bench.
Here you will learn why this false idea has failed miserably and how we can end federal judicial tyranny BEFORE THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. .
"Federal judicial corruption is out of control. The problem is the Republican Party's insane idea that you can fix judicial corruption by adding more conservative judges to the bench. This stupid idea must be trashed and replaced with smart regulation of judicial conduct that will really end judicial corruption. This is exactly what I will do for you, as your Republican State Committeeman."
Manuel P. Asensio
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE TEN HISTORICAL AND LEGAL FACTS THAT WE REPUBLICANS EXECUTIVE LEADERS NEED TO KNOW TO
END FEDERAL JUDICIAL TYRANNY.
1
Giovanni Gentile
The Father of Fascism and most notably known for his "Doctrine on Fascism," 1932
Karl Marx
The father of Communism and the author of the "Communist Manifesto," 1848
US federal judges openly dishonor and reject America's glorious history and openly advocate national policies that violate the American Constitution's rules of law, principles, and values. They do so under the protection of lawyers and under the cover of the malicious lie that "postmodern political philosophy" is legally enforceable in US courts.
In fact, postmodern policies are not a high-minded idea to improve America’s constitutional capitalist democratic republic or the secular wisdom of its underlying Judeo-Christian values.
Postmodern policies are the same evil that is Fascism, which was created by Giovanni Gentile (1875 - 1944), and Communism, which created by Karl Marx (1818 - 1883) under a different label. Postmodern policies are the same exact tyranny that the American Constitution out laws under all circumstances and conditions.
In US courts, postmodern policies are evil money-making schemes to destroy the rule of law, limitations on government power, separation of powers, separation of church and state, and due process.
2
Members of the Judicial Conference outside the White House. Chief Justice William Howard Taft is in the first row, second from right. (1926)
On Dec. 28, 1922, Chief Justice William Howard Taft convened a meeting in the Capitol building, in the rooms then reserved for the Supreme Court. The present Supreme Court building had not yet been built. Joining him were the most senior judges from each of the nine existing circuit courts. It was known as the Conference of Senior Circuit Judges.
Today (as the next 8 sections will show) the US Judicial Conference has became the bureaucratic behemoth and the epicenter of organized federal judicial corruption. Unbeknownst to Americans, Chief Justice John Roberts controls the Judicial Conference as its executive officer with an iron fist. More concerning, and also unperceived to Americans, Roberts is the chief justice for life, and because as a matter of law the executive officer of the Judicial Conference is the chief justice, Roberts is also the ruler of the Judicial Conference for life.
He has blatantly and shamelessly declared that Judicial Conference serves as a national policy making body for the federal courts. Chief Justice Roberts along with others in the federal government are openly fabricating national judicial policies to govern rulings in trial and appeal courts in the United States. Cases that challenges any of these judicially fabricated policies are summarily dismissed and cases that advance the Conference's policies are favored.
Americans are repulsed by secret associations, secret proceedings, and secret agreements in any form at any level in our government. Here you have Roberts and Judicial Conference openly and shamelessly engaged in national politics.
In 1934 FDR signed the Rules Enabling Act
By 1934 the Judicial Conference's encroachment on Congress's exclusive power to make laws had become a major problem in American government. The Act was a peace treaty between Congress and the federal judges. In theory, Congress retained the power to review and reject any rule the federal judges created. Of course, Congress has no chance of uniting to reject any rule the federal judges fabricated under the Enabling Act. The federal judges simply created a committee to make deals with the few members of Congress that are suppose to protect you against organized federal judicial corruption.
Today, the left's judicial ideologies has created the notion that the federal judges can create national laws by themselves.
The Nazi government in Germany had passed its own Enabling Act in 1933. It allow them to issue laws without the consent of Germany’s parliament. This is the foundation for the complete Nazification of German society.
The law was celebrated the day after it was published under the name of the “Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich.”
HOW CHIEF JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS BECOME AMERICA'S "MAD MAN"
The Dirty Half A Dozen
Congressional Failures
Since 1934, Congress and the federal judges have been playing a cat and mouse game. Congress has modified, changes, and amended the Rules Enabling Act of 1934 countless times by Congress. The significant the deals cut by Congress with the federal judges were done in 1950, 1966, 1972, 1988, 1990, and 1992.
1. 1950 Amendment: Supposedly attempted to clarify the rulemaking procedures and extended the act to include rules of criminal procedure.
2. 1966 Amendment: Then Congress widen the scope of the act to allow for the creation of bankruptcy rules.
3. 1972 Amendment: First allowed the federal judges to make up their own evidence rules but then Congress was forced to pass the Federal Rules of Evidence.
4. 1988 Amendment: Rubber stamped the judges appellate procedures deals.
5. 1990 Amendment: Congress gave the judges that power to coordinate rules by themselves.
6. 1992 Amendment: Congress tried again to rein in the federal judges rulemaking processes and ensured compliance with congressional statutes.
THEN CAME GREATEST SINGLE ERROR IN
AMERICAN LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
THE JUDIICAL CONDUCT ACT OF 1980
On October 15, 1980, forty six years and more than a half dozen failed attempts to fix the Rules Enabling Act, President Jimmy Carter (for his own selfish interest of fencing off Ronald Regan's Silent Majority Movement) signed the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act. This law is actually the most significant amendment to the Rules Enabling Act. The Act established a formal process to prosecute corrupt federal judges. The Act explicitly provided all American the power to protect themselves against Congress' original errors in the Rules Enabling Act of 1934.
Roberts has single handedly turned this Act on its head and used to fabricate his own policies. In 2020, Asensio published "Trump Unites All Americans" a graphic novel telling this story to President Donald J. Trump through the eyes of his daughter, Eva. You can click on the button below to read it.
3
ROBERTS'S CORRUPTION IN THREE EASY PIECES
How Roberts used the Judicial Conduct Act of 1980 to Put Organized Federal Judicial Corruption on Steroids
1
BY 1980, Americans WERE SO OUTRAGE AND MORALLY DISGUSTED with federal judicial corruption that the Roe vs. Wade decision blew up into Ronald Reagan's Silent Majority movement. In an attempt to take some of the Silent Majority votes, the Democrats passed the Judicial Conduct Act of October 15, 1980, days before the election. He lost anyway.
2
ROBERTS has turned the Judicial Conduct Act, the most powerful law ever enacted since the passing of the Bill of Rights that was created by amending the Constitution, upside down. The Act completely reorganized the Judicial Conference to deal with the organized federal judges' corruption. However, Congress made a fatal mistake. IT GRANTED THE CHIEF JUSTICE ABSOLUTE POWER TO KEEP THE WHOLE THING SECRET! EVEN WORSE, CONGRESS HAD PREVIOUSLY MADE THE MISTAKE OF GRANTING THE CHIEF JUSTICE ABSOLUTE POWER OVER THE RULE ENABLING ACT!
3
There is nothing complicated or mysterious about Roberts or his conduct. Roberts has simply organized and controls federal judicial corruption - he put Roe vs. Wade on steroids. Its judges doing dirty deals and then using their government positions as judges to deliberately violate the Constitution's limitations and separations of powers and due process - its malicious judges faking being good judges. Good judges do not lie and cheat and use the US marshal's in their courtrooms to silence their opposition to dismiss cases and favor cases to concentrate power for themselves.
Chief Justice John Roberts has used his control the 102 year old US Judicial Conference and Congress's long record of errors and defects organize federal judicial corruption. Roberts excuses the corruption under the title of "post-modern" policies, which are simply fascist and communist political schemes.
You have seen the factual history, now you can discern the truth yourself.
Roberts' real power comes from being the "presiding officer" of the US Judicial Conference not from being one of the nine judges who sit on the US Supreme Court.
Roberts has used his expanded powers under the Judicial Conduct Act to consolidate control over not only the US Judicial Conference but the Administrative Office of the US Courts, the Federal Judiciary Center, the Federal Judiciary Center Foundation, and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. He silently uses this vast federal bureaucracy to create what he calls a "national policymaking body." This is legal code for what Roberts does, which is organizing "deliberate and malicious judicial misconduct" in US courts. Flying under the post-modern political ideologies flag, Roberts has overpowered the president and Congress as a whole to establish an iron fisted control over the Judicial Conduct Act and the Rule Enactment Act - and with all rulings in trial an appeal courts that challenge him or his fabricated judicial policies.
4
Ted Cruz
Lindsey Graham
Jim Jordan
Our GOP leaders who set the Republican Party's federal judiciary policies are responsible for reviewing and regulating Chief Justice Roberts policy making and conduct.
Roberts could not have transformed the US Judicial Conference into a policymaking juggernaut without making agreements with the members of Congress who control the nation's federal judicial policy. Together this group has become a shadow government operating a national policymaking bureaucracy entirely outside of law, not in accordance with the Constitution but in accordance with post-modern political philosophy.
5
Roberts and his wife, Jane Roberts, who has allegedly been paid more than $10 million by an array of D.C. law firms for work as a "legal recruiter."
On top of everything else, Roberts is the Chancellor of Smithsonian Institution’s Board of Regents that includes three members of the Senate; three members of the House of Representatives; and nine citizen members who are nominated by the Board approved by the Congress in a joint resolution with the President of the United States.
6
Independence Hall where In 1776 our Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence.
In 1788, the Founding Fathers and later delegates to the Constitutional Convention created and signed the United States Constitution. It was here where the Founding Fathers shared and debated the federalist papers.
The Founders' Federalist Papers are the foundation of the US Constitution and cornerstone of US law.
7
In crafting the Constitution the Founding Fathers sought to ensure that “the general liberty of the people can never be endangered by the federal judiciary,” that “liberty can have nothing to fear from the judiciary” and recognized that liberty has “everything to fear” from federal judicial corruption.
8
America’s lead writer of the Federalist Paper, Alexander Hamilton shared the Founding Father’s fear of corrupt federal judges, we wrote that “of the three powers, the judiciary is next to nothing.”
9
The Founders described the federal judges as “beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power” who must never be able to attain the power to “attack with success either of the two other branches [the president or Congress].”
For all these good natural reasons, the Founders prohibited federal judges having any political power to keep them for having any “ influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society and can take no active resolution whatever.”
10
YOU ARE RIGHT!
IT'S OBVIOUS. NOW YOU HAVE THE POWER TO FIX IT!
Records at the US Judicial Conference contain inexorable evidence showing Robert deliberately repeatedly violating the Judicial Conduct Act’s Black Letter Laws that command him to enter orders forbidding any federal judge or group of federal judges who is the subject to proceedings under the Judicial Conduct Act from appearing at the Judicial Conference and Judicial Councils.
These Laws apply to the chief judges of a the nation's 13 US circuit courts and 90 or so US district courts. Yet never in the 44 years since the Judicial Conduct Act have one US attorney after the other have worked belly-to-belly with the chief justice to keep the whole bleeding thing secrete.