THE CONSTITUTION DISCIPLINES THE LEFT

THE CONSTITUTION MAKES THE LEFT AND LEFTIST POLICIES AND POLITICAL IDEAS ILLEGAL AND UNDEMOCRATIC. IT CONTROLS THE LEFT ESPECIALLY LEFTIST FEDERAL JUDGES.

The Constitution as proposed in Philadelphia did not command uncontested founding-generation assent. The people demanded a bill of rights, and only after their demand was satisfied did the Constitution become legitimate.

Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation said no alteration could be made unless it was agreed to by Congress and then confirmed by the legislatures of every state.

That is the unanimity rule. It did not say nine states. It said every state.

NEITHER CONGRESS NOR THE FOUNDING GENERATION DID NOT RATIFY THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION PROPOSED BY THE DELEGATES TO THE PHILADELPHIA CONVENTION.

THAT CONVENTION WAS NOT CALLED BY CONGRESS TO CREATE A NEW CONSTITUTION, MUCH LESS A NEW BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT MADE UP OF FEDERAL JUDGES.

THAT CONVENTION WAS NEVER CALLED A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION.

CONGRESS REFUSED TO DEBATE THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION OR CREATION OF A FEDERAL JUDICIARY.

THEY REFUSED. THEY DID NOT ENDORSE IT.

CONGRESS SIMPLY SENT IT OUT TO THE 13 UNITED STATES TO CORRECT, MODIFY, CHANGE, AND THEN RATIFY CONDITIONED BASED UPON A PROMISE THAT THEIR ALTERATIONS WOULD BE ENACTED BY THE NEW CONGRESS.

THOSE ALTERATIONS ARE THE BILL OF RIGHTS.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS GOVERNS THE

FEDERAL JUDGES.

WITHOUT THE BILL OF RIGHTS, THE IDEA OF CREATING A FEDERAL JUDICIARY BRANCH WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN RATIFIED.

WE THE PEOPLE OF FLORIDA'S 6TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ARE ON THE FRONT LINES TO RESTRAIN, RESTRICT, AND DISCIPLINE THE LEFT.

KEEP IT SIMPLE. ESPECIALLY ABOUT THE FEDERAL JUDGES.

HERE ARE 36 FACT STATEMENTS TO ELIMINATE ANY DOUBTS AND AVOID ANY CONFUSION ABOUT THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL LIMITS ON THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL JUDGES, THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY, THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES, AND CONDUCT IN COURTS FROM THE BENCH.

FIST AND ABOVE ALL OF THESE RESTRICTIONS ON THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL JUDGES WERE CAST IN STONE ON OCTOBER 15, 1980 WHEN PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER SIGNED THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT ACT INTO LAW.

ARTICLE III PROPOSED ABOUT 375 WORDS TO CREATE THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY.
THAT WAS ALL. 375 WORDS. NOTHING ABOUT SUPREMANCY. NOTHING ABOUT A HIGHLY CONTRAVERSIAL FEDERAL JUDGE NAMED JOHN MARSHALL WHO ROBERTS CLAIMS "INVENTED" JUDICIAL SUPREMACY.
IT DID NOT CREATE A COURT WITH ANY SUPERMANCY OR POLITICAL POWER.
IT DID NOT CREATE JUDGES WHO COULD CHANGE THE CONSTITUION IN ANY WAY.
IT DID NOT CREATE FEDERAL JUDGES WITH GENERAL POWER OVER THE PEOPLE.
IT DID NOT GIVE FEDERAL JUDGES POWER TO RULE OVER EVERYTHING.
IT DID NOT GIVE FEDERAL JUDGES POWER TO REPLACE JURIES.
IT DID NOT GIVE FEDERAL JUDGES POWER TO DECIDE FACTS THAT BELONG TO THE PEOPLE.
THE ONLY OPERATIONAL LIMITING LANGUAGE WAS JURISDICTION.
THE JUDICIAL POWER WAS LIMITED TO CASES AND CONTROVERSIES.
CONTROVERSIES MEAN REAL DISPUTES.
CONTROVERSIES DO NOT MEAN JUDICIAL COMMAND OVER THE PEOPLE.
CONTROVERSIES DO NOT MEAN FEDERAL JUDGES CAN INVENT POWER.
CONTROVERSIES DO NOT MEAN FEDERAL JUDGES CAN TAKE THE PLACE OF JURIES.
THE CONSTITUTION DID NOT TRUST FEDERAL JUDGES WITH THE FACTS.
THE CONSTITUTION TRUSTED JURIES.
THE JURY WAS THE CONCRETE PROTECTION.
THE JURY WAS THE PEOPLE INSIDE THE COURTROOM.
THE JURY WAS THE BARRIER BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND THE CITIZEN.
ONLY JURIES CAN PROTECT THE PEOPLE FROM FEDERAL JUDGES.
ONLY JURIES CAN PROTECT THE PEOPLE FROM FEDERAL PROSECUTORS.
ONLY JURIES CAN PROTECT THE PEOPLE FROM GOVERNMENT POWER.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS ABOUT PROTECTING THE PEOPLE.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS IS ABOUT JURIES.
THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PROTECTS THE GRAND JURY.
THE SIXTH AMENDMENT PROTECTS THE CRIMINAL JURY.
THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT PROTECTS THE CIVIL JURY.
THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROTECTS DUE PROCESS.
DUE PROCESS MEANS THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT GET TO TAKE LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY BY JUDICIAL COMMAND.
THE PEOPLE KEPT THE JURY BECAUSE THE PEOPLE DID NOT TRUST GOVERNMENT POWER.
THE PEOPLE KEPT THE JURY BECAUSE THE PEOPLE DID NOT TRUST FEDERAL POWER.
THE PEOPLE KEPT THE JURY BECAUSE THE PEOPLE DID NOT TRUST FEDERAL JUDGES TO BE THE FINAL DECISION MAKERS OF FACT.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS CONTROLS THE JUDGES.
THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT CONTROLS THE JUDGES.
THE JURY CONTROLS THE FACTS.
FEDERAL JUDGES DO NOT CONTROL THE PEOPLE.
FEDERAL JUDGES ARE CONTROLLED BY THE CONSTITUTION.

AGAIN, TO REPEAT, LASTLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, ALL OF THIS WAS CAST IN STONE ON OCTOBER 15, 1980 WHEN PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER SIGNED THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT ACT INTO LAW.

THE WAR IN FLORIDA’S 6TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT WILL DETERMINE WHETHER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WILL FIGHT LEFTISTS OR KEEP PLAYING WITH THEM

Go to www.asensioforcongress.com

Manuel P. Asensio Candidate for Congress in Florida's 6th Congressional District